An initial investigation by the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has found UnitedHealth’s £1.2bn deal to buy EMIS could reduce competition, leading to worse outcomes for the NHS and ultimately patients and UK taxpayers.
EMIS is an established supplier of data management systems to the NHS, including the electronic patient record system used by the majority of NHS GPs in the UK.
Optum, part of the US healthcare giant UnitedHealth, currently supplies software used by GPs when prescribing medicines, as well as data analytics and advisory services that the NHS uses to help improve overall healthcare and health service provision, or population management.
As part of its Phase 1 investigation the CMA looked into these services and how UnitedHealth’s purchase of EMIS might impact competition to develop and supply digital and data analytics products to the NHS.
The investigation found competition could be substantially reduced specifically in the Population Health Management and medicines optimisation software markets, which enable the safe and effective use of medicines.
The CMA is concerned the deal could impact services provided by Optum’s competitors. Optum and its competitors rely on digital connections to the data that EMIS holds, and integrations with EMIS’s electronic patient record system.
Optum could, if the merger went ahead as planned, choose to limit these connections and the CMA believes this could unfairly undermine competing businesses. The NHS, as the customer of these products, could then face fewer options, and higher prices or lower quality offerings.
Sorcha O’Carroll, Senior Mergers Director at the CMA, said: “The NHS and the millions of patients under its care depend on critical behind-the-scenes technology to ensure people are looked after and receive the treatment needed to get better.
“This deal could see the NHS lose out on the benefits of competition, including innovation in these products and services and getting better value for money. UnitedHealth has the opportunity to address our concerns; otherwise, it will progress to a more in-depth investigation.”
UnitedHealth and EMIS have five working days to offer legally binding proposals to the CMA to address the concerns identified. The CMA would then have a further five working days to consider whether this address its concerns, or if the case should be referred to the next stage, Phase 2 investigation.
24 March 2023 @ 12:43
Its not that difficult – they just say that they are unable to provide access because they are wanting to protect the patient data and info sec is their priority. Hence no access.
,,,,I’m taking it you’ve never had past dealings with Intersystems. 🙂
22 March 2023 @ 14:14
I dont understand how EMIS could limit access to the data they hold. It is not their data. I know there are often challenges to getting DSA’s signed by GPs for the sharing of their respective practice data, but this is not an EMIS issue.
Ex NHS Techie
25 March 2023 @ 11:18
Easily done by adopting proprietary interfaces to the systems holding the patient data which only your products can use.
There are too many precedents across a wide range of domains, including health, for the CMA to ignore.